Friday, October 07, 2005

wondering through the warehouse

let me preface this poorly rendered reflection by admitting that i had a spectacular time at soybean bible college. although at first i felt “kind of cool, you know, and kind of weird. like something you would see on David Letterman,” i quickly adjusted to campus culture. to wit: within mere hours of my arrival i was drinking lukewarm coffee in the warehouse, desalinating my tongue and thinking that “shane and shane” might not be as queer as i first thought.

anyway, after sitting through an old professor’s class and responded to his introduction with a slightly suggestive joke that the students either didn’t understand or appreciate, the aforementioned scholar and i sat down to talk about ourselves and size one another up.


after the scholar reported that his doctoral studies went well and i ragged him a bit about his pacific coast tan lines, i began to tell him a bit about my ministry. i prefaced my comments with a warning that i was not an apologist for, but a friend of emergent (which seems to be the new willow creek whipping boy for soybean scholars) i told him that i had never felt more personally centered and integrated into the kingdom than i do at present.

much to my surprise, my scholarly friend responded to my story fairly sharply. he suggested that non-institutional forms of church were strains of a virus that sucked vitality out of and were completely dependent upon its institutional host and he openly wondered whether my investment in our community was hindering the Community of which many of us are a part. i mentioned that similar strategies were employed by Jesus and he responded by replacing WWJD with WWJWMTDT (which stands for “what would Jesus want me to do today?”). I told him his acronym was much too complicated and would never catch on (unlike my Forever Under Christ the King logo, but that’s another story altogether). when i admitted that i found the worldview focus at the alma mater to be fairly troubling, since such frames seems to be overly-reductionistic at best and a potential matrix of judgment at worst, he told me that it was a pity that i would not be endowed with the ability to dust the frames and replace them when necessary. confounded by my friend’s lack of affirmation i sought refuge in my coffee and promptly ingested the foreign object (a baby roach. oh soybean, some things never change. which reminds me: current students, don’t let the ultra-modern sheen of the cafeteria fool you. the septic system backs up through the drain in the kitchen when there is barely a threat of rain) found within.

i hope that you hear what i am saying as well as what i am not. as for the latter, do not doubt my love for my friend or assume that i question his intentions. he is not only on the road of incarnation and redemption that i wander, but is one of the only reasons i am there at all. however, i do question his elevation of the mega over the micro and am confused by his numeric metric of success. he clearly believes that i am called to great things. i wonder whether i have settled for less.

rest assured that i do not think so either. but it is not wise to quickly cast aside the words of one’s advisor.

you know what’s worse than elementary poetry and middle school prose? being in the middle of a post and realizing it is a mix of both.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i would like to thank those that made my time at soybean so enjoyable. neal, thanks for the hospitality and the ongoing conversation. i never expected you to speak with me at length, much less serve as my spiritual director. thank miriam for allowing this arrested adolescent to stay in your home and eat at your table. toad, thanks for blowing off work to catch up with me. jackaway, thank you for keeping me company, constantly pushing our conversations from the level of abstraction to one of application and not being too sore that i couldn’t take you to the bar. such connections between alumni and students are strictly forbidden. besides, i didn’t want to spoil your “week of e” pub crawl. tracy thank you for accompanying me to the crack house. conversations just seem to have more clarity in those environs. aaron, i’m glad that you have seen the light concerning sam adams. now we won’t have to bar your light-beer drinking ass from our beloved commonwealth. unnamed scholar, thank you for the conversation. your friendship and guidance mean more to me than i can explain. katie, i’m sorry that we did not get to connect. i loved being your youth pastor and am sure that you’re making your parents and rgcc proud. intro to the bible students, you should have laughed at my quip. rest assured that i learned all of my sexual humor from the Bible. rest assured that it is ok to laugh and even, occasionally, swear in the warehouse. in the latter matter, let jackaway serve as your shining example.

in case you're still wondering. i have since reverted to my original opinion about "shane and shane."

8 comments:

Agent B said...

I think all institutional guys, like your professor, will defend the institution with every ounce of energy they have. It's the very foundation of their lives and therefore it's all they've got.

And Shane & Shane...just looked them up for the 1st time. I know I'm not suppose to judge a book by its cover...but I don't know how to finish this sentence.

Becky said...

gotta give you props for the courage to bring up emergent with a bible college prof...and wonder if you're not maybe a little less cynical than you thought if his reaction suprised you.

g13 said...

aaron, i thought that might provoke a response. let the record show that aaron does not like light beer. he prefers bartles and james strawberry cooler, mike's hard lemonade, magnum cider and other varities of what my brother lovingly refers to as "bitch beer."

just kidding. monts has the biggest balls of us all.

b, i don't know if he was intentionally defending the institution. i think his primary passion is for evangelism. this passion, partnered with the fact that he readily embraces the arminian theology of our stone-cambell forbears, seems to encourage a bigger is better philosophy. in his defense, if you're going to go down that route, he's doing it the right way. he's mentoring a number of students at the college, deeply invested in the leadership and fellow members of his mega-church, etc. in regards to the stone-campbell movement he's actually a pretty progressive. i think that's why i was caught of gaurd by the development of our conversation.

becky, the crazy thing is the emergent connection was assumed, not stated, as soon as i mentioned the home church. i went to great lengths to explain my relational connections to the emergent conversation, but but did not attempt to provide an apology for it. that being said, i did suggest that i would rather talk about it as a positive mutation or anti-viral than a virus.

when i was a student at soybean, willow creek was heavily criticized (though not by my scholarly friend, as far as i can remember) and was a constant topic of conversation. now a number of the professors are either preaching at large churches or are intimately involved with large churches and have turned their sights upon emergent. i what ironic changes ten more years will bring.

Agent B said...

Guess I didn't carefully read your post or didn't pick up on your professor's overall tone. Glad he wasn't berating you.

PS: anyone...what's the gag w/ "soybean"?

g13 said...

no worries agent b, i didn't take it that way. i just don't want anyone to think i am speaking poorly or unfairly about my friend the prof.

as per soybean, i dunno. it's just a bit of slang that i dig. it also keeps people from receiving unexpected responses to their google searches.

Anonymous said...

I think a lot of the criticism from these professors can be traced to Carson's book, "Becoming convergent with Emergent." I appreciate your wanting to stick with our Stone/Campbell movement. For me, I have decided to move on...

g13 said...

what do you mean move on? we're still in this together bro.

Michelle said...

Forgive me but why are the profs so threatened by what your doing?
Besides encouraging followers to spend tithe dollares on F.U.C.K. braclets.